from Archives - News

County Pit Bull Adoption Ban Sparks Lawsuit

(Created: Monday, October 8, 2007 12:21 PM EDT)

| Text Size | print | e-mail | comment (13 comment(s)) |
The Animal Rescue League of Tidewater is suing to force Loudoun County to abandon its prohibition on the adoption of pit bulls brought to the animal shelter.

The lawsuit, which includes a request for an injunction to immediately block any other pit bulls from being euthanized, is set for a Loudoun County Circuit Court hearing next Monday.

The litigation was filed by Ron Litz and the Animal Rescue of Tidewater. They allege that county's policy forbidding the adoption of pit bull and pit bull mix breeds violates sate law.

Although county leaders acknowledged earlier this year that the adoption policy must change to comply with Virginia law, they have been slow to put an alternative policy in place.

The board of supervisors and the Animal Advisory Committee, along with shelter managers, have been debating changes that would permit some pit bull transfers to rescue leagues for several months, but no action has been taken. The ACC is scheduled to continue its review Wednesday.

The shelter's current adoption policy reads, "Due to the unpredictable nature of the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Terrier and the wolf or wolf hybrids, the Animal Shelter will not adopt out these animals, whether pure or mixed." Because the policy prohibits their adoption or transfer to other shelters, the dogs are kept at the shelter for a 10-day waiting period, and if no owner claims them they are euthanized.

According the lawsuit, Virginia's Comprehensive Animal Laws state: "No canine or canine crossbreed shall be found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog solely because it is a particular breed." The suit contends that the shelter's policy unfairly designates all pit bulls and pit bull mixes as "unpredictable" and therefore dangerous. The lawsuit also relies on an October 2006 opinion of Virginia Attorney General Robert McDonnell that found that "publicly funded animal shelters or pounds may not euthanize dogs based solely upon breed."

When made aware of McDonnell's opinion, shelter administration began exploring how they might change their policy. In February, the shelter conducted a survey of public opinion regarding pit bull adoptions. Of the 1,078 respondents, two-thirds were in favor of allowing the dog's adoption to responsible owners, provided the individual dog did not pose a threat.

In May, the shelter began talks with local rescue leagues, shelters and its employees to identify alternatives. Tom Koenig, director of ACC, said as a result of these meetings, the county has a plan to train staff on how to assess individual animal's level of threat. Though a new policy on adoption of pit bulls has not been formally adopted, the shelter has begun transferring the dogs to other local shelters or breed rescue organizations provided they pass a behavioral assessment test levied by the shelter staff.

Litz contends the shelter still is not doing enough to stem the killings.

"They're not always successful transferring the dogs. In February talks began, but this has been going on for a long time and could continue for a long time while they continue to kill pit bulls. I don't think they're making efforts to stop killing them. If they're coming in, they can't adopt out and they can't transfer them, then what is happening to those dogs?"

Responding to Koenig's claims that the dogs are now being assessed for temperament and if deemed safe are transferred out of the pound, Litz said, "I think their temperament tests are ridiculous. A lot of animals die in that shelter and taxpayers pay a lot of money to care for these animals-not to kill them. Many people are not aware of what's going on out there."

The animal shelter currently has 45 kennels and a capacity to hold at least that many dogs. Last week, there were two dogs housed on the adoption floor, however adoptions are pending for both. Five pit bulls were being held as well.

According to Koenig, approximately 100 pit bulls or pit bull mix breeds are brought to the shelter each year, anywhere from six to 10 pit bulls a month. Only four have been transferred out of the pound since May. All others have been killed.

Video Comments

Reader Comments
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of Leesburg Today.
Total Comments: 13 comment(s)

siansimon wrote on Jun 20, 2008 11:16 PM:

" Does anyone have any updates on this?

We have a Pit Bull/ Lab mix that was on death row at an out of Loudoun shelter, although we live in Loudoun.

She is the best dog EVER - the kids play with her for hours and she is always gentle. She is my constant companion around our horse barn. She is smart as a whip and gentle as a lamb. She makes me laugh every day.

We've had many many "well bred/ pure bred" dogs over the years, including two Golden Retrievers. Daisy came into our lives by accident, but she is absolutely the best dog we will ever have the honor of sharing our life with. We know that without question.

Thank god she didn't end up dead in the Loudoun County Shelter.

Sure, she is an energetic dog, but she gets tons of exercise on our farm. Maybe the shelters should try placing these great dogs where they can do what they are born to do - roam and protect. Just because everyone in Loudoun seems to live in a subdivision these days (where I know she would be miserable), doesn't mean they should be killed.

I guess this is as much a comment on the horrible creeping subdivision Loudoun has become as the ridiculousness of killing all Pibbles that end up at the shelter. Sigh.... "

rgribble1 wrote on Oct 12, 2007 7:00 AM:

" Did you know American Pit Bull Terriers have a passing rate of over 84%, based upon tests by the American Temperament Test Society, higher than the Golden Retriever. Loudon Counties policy discriminates against a breed. If they do want to temperament test it should be extended to all animals in the shelter, not a specific breed. They should have certified Behaviorists do this. "

teel0511 wrote on Oct 12, 2007 2:34 AM:

" Shame on you, Animal Rescue League! Transferring pit bulls WITHOUT a temperament test? The county will get SUED when one of these aggressive dogs kills or hurts someone. And many of these "pit bull rescues" are actually pit bull breeders looking for free stock to breed! Most valid pit bull rescues are FULL and have no room. I question the aims and interests of this animal league. And I would hope these dogs are not getting transferred to dog fighters. Animal Rescue League, why not do something to STOP the overpopulation of these dogs and the dog fighting, instead of pushing for the release of aggressive dogs!! "

inge wrote on Oct 10, 2007 9:27 PM:

" charleyp1 wrote on Oct 9, 2007 12:36 PM: " I take it back. If you read the Merritt Clifton report on Dog attacks by breed..." Charleyp1: Surely you don't intend to use the Merritt Clifton report for anything other than lining the bottom of your small animal cages. Why? Because the "study" is based on NEWS reports, and the media INVARIABLY ignores all but the Rottweiler and pit bull attacks. Frankly, I'm shocked there were as many breeds as there were in Merritt's so-called "study". News reports from all over the country blame attacks on "pit bulls", but in at least a third of these news accounts, photos of the dogs in these attacks clearly show dogs of other types or mixes that are true "heinz 57s" and are no more "pit bulls" than you are! So, what is he doing, IGNORING all those incidents??? Also, notice that the "study" only counts reports in which the breed is known. Well, knowing the way the media works, if it's not a pit bull or a Rottweiler, its usually "just a dog". There's no way he can investigate each and every account because the background information often does not exist. So this "study" DOES NOT COUNT a lot of non-pit/rott maulings; thereby further OVERinflating the disparity. Some of his "notes" completely contradict: on the one hand he says he's only counting dogs that were kept "as pets", on the other hand tried to "excuse" or explain attacks by saying the dogs were kept in a "semi-feral" state. Frankly, a dog can't be a semi-feral pet!! This study is crap, AFAIAK. Nice try CharleyP1 "

Thad... wrote on Oct 9, 2007 2:57 PM:

" While we're quoting stats and outlawing things, consider the following: Snapshot of Virginia: Year - 2004 Persons killed by dogs: 0 Persons killed by lightning: 1 Child died in hot car: hyperthermia: 2 Bicycle-related deaths: 9 Persons drowned in swimming pool: 15 ATV-related fatalities: 22 Furthermore, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: In 2005, 26 children died in Virginia from maltreatment (abuse/neglect). In a SINGLE YEAR, 2005, more than THREE TIMES as many children died from maltreatment (abuse/neglect) than the TOTAL from ALL dog attacks over the past 42 years. www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com Just think; we could outlaw bicycles, swimming pools, ATV's, and parents. Now we're getting somewhere. "

charleyp1 wrote on Oct 9, 2007 12:36 PM:

" I take it back. If you read the Merritt Clifton report on Dog attacks by breed, you will see that Pitt Bulls, Rottweilers, and Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study. Here is the link so that you may read the study for yourselves: http://www.dogbitelaw.com/Dog%20Attacks%201982%20to%202006%20Clifton.pdf That is an alarming figure, and if true, then by all means, the General Assembly needs to alter its Virginia Comprehensive Animal Laws to allow for the destruction of these dogs. Furthermore, if this report is accurate, the Commonwealth should consider a ban, or at least require a license/ registration "

charleyp1 wrote on Oct 9, 2007 12:12 PM:

" So why do so many fatal maullings come from Pit Bulls? I'm not suggesting that all Pit Bulls are dangerous, but there seems to be an inordinate amount of injury and death caused by these animals. Perhaps it is training (or the lack of) that causes some of these animals to be so inordinately violent, I really don't know. Perhaps some detailed studies should be done. I would love to know the actual statistics comparing Pit Bull attacks to those of other breeds. "

Thad... wrote on Oct 9, 2007 11:39 AM:

" The County, by its willful and continual violation of the law, has shown not only its contempt for these animals and the law that protects them, but its inability to make unbiased judgements in determining the suitability of any particular animal for adoption. Are there not any "teeth" to the laws that would insure their enforcement? Is the entire legal system worthless in the protection of animals? "

Thad... wrote on Oct 9, 2007 11:31 AM:

" The County, by its willful and continual violation of the law, has shown not only its contempt for these animals and the law that protects them, but its inability to make unbiased judgements in determining the suitability of any particular animal for adoption. Are there not any "teeth" to the laws that would insure their enforcement? Has the entire system become gutless? "

rexroy01 wrote on Oct 9, 2007 9:32 AM:

" Thank you Animal Rescue League of Tidewater and Ron Litz. The Loudoun Shelter must comply with state law and not arbitrarily kill dogs by breed. Across the nation, educated shelters know this is not the problem – never has been and does not work. Leave the breeds out of it. This illegal activity of putting down pit bulls has been going on for too long. Thankfully educated citizens are getting involved since our elected officials have taken no action. Please support this long overdue legal action. "

mybarbiesrule wrote on Oct 9, 2007 7:21 AM:

" another reason why no strays should EVER be taken to an animal shelter. Please take them to a no-kill organization. Pits are wonderful dogs. Punish the deed; not the breed. "

Teddy wrote on Oct 8, 2007 8:57 PM:

" These wonderful dogs have always been THE all-American dog, being placed in the movies, even, since way back ... They are smart and incredibly loving .... This judgemental attitude toward them as a whole, is terribly wrong and unjust. The DEED is to be judged - NOT the BREED. DON'T YOU GET IT??!!!! "

Sydney wrote on Oct 8, 2007 8:06 PM:

" It is shame that the Shelter and the County has dragged their feet and the result has cost the needless lives of animals. Thank you to Mr. Litz and to the Animal Rescue League of Tidewater for taking up this cause. It is the right thing. Mr. Konig, you can make this happen. You are the one entursted with their care, with their lives. Please choose to help them. Not because you are being forced, but because it is the right thing to do. "



You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code: